Defining God

“mathematically speaking, is why God is more like a line than a point.”

“Nicolaus proposed thinking of God in an image more than like the line which is by definition unbounded,
impossible to hem-in or to possess.

Instead of thinking of God in constrained images equivalent to mathematical symbols of the sphere or the triangle…”
he suggested viewing God as a line.

Constantine’s Sword page 349

“Theologians spoke of God as they understood God fully, and they sought to enforce a uniformity of thought that left no room for mystery, ambiguity or paradox. Nicolaus of Cusa saw, on the contrary, that God is God precisely in escaping and transcending total comprehension by human beings. Just as a line is defined by its movement in opposite directions at once, so God is the coincidence of opposites, the one in whom maximum and minimum fall together. In God, the coincidence occurs in such a way that the contraries maintain their differences, which, mathematically speaking, is why God is more like a line than a point.”

The Sword of Constantine page 350